This has got to be one of the worst office faux pas ever.I was downloading a Nine Inch Nails cd while verifying a set of instances I'd built yesterday. I had my big headphones on - the big puffy ones I bought to cut down on the noise around me. I pulled the headphones off and realized the music wasn't playing in my headphones, it was playing on the laptop, loudly enough to hear over the
I will be gave two new presentations that are on my website.
I will be gave two new presentations that are on my website.
System statistics in 9i
In 10g the CPU costing mode is enabled by default and is supported by the default NOWORKLOAD system statistics.
But you can use system statistics already in 9i, although you have to enable them explicitly.
Oracle 9i is out of support, but I guess there are still a lot of systems out there that are using the 9.2 release, therefore I find it worth to mention what you can do in 9i with system statistics. This can be helpful if you consider to test your application already in the 9i environment with system statistics before upgrading to 10g.
In most descriptions about 9i and system statistics only WORKLOAD system statistics are mentioned, but 9i also supports NOWORKLOAD system statistics, although not in the same full flavour as 10g does.
You can activate CPU costing in 9i by running DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS('NOWORKLOAD'), but this seems to work differently than in 10g and later.
Whereas in 10g and later this actually measures the IOSEEKTIM and IOTFRSPEED values, this seems to activate in 9i something that is comparable with the default NOWORKLOAD system statistics of 10g.
The SYS.AUX_STATS$ does not show any actual values, but tests revealed that 9i (at least 184.108.40.206) in that case seems to measure the CPU speed (in 10g this is the CPUSPEEDNW value) and uses the same default values for IOSEEKTIM and IOTFRSPEED as 10g does (10ms and 4096 bytes/ms resp.).
Running some tests showed that you arrive at the same I/O cost as you do in 10g with the default NOWORKLOAD system statistics.
I found the original post interesting - mostly because I liked the answer the technical writer gave. A bit of background - someone interviewing for a technical writing position is asked what is clearly a "hard core, heads down, write code programmer question". The question seemed entirely inappropriate for the position - but - the answer given was great (I thought)
The answer consisted of lots of questions - in effect - a lot of push back. Define this, specify that, clarify this - need more information.
I can relate.
What surprised me was that a lot of the feedback was negative. A lot of people said "would never hire you", "you missed the point".
All of the time I was reading though, I was nodding my head saying "yeah, what about that". I would have hired him on the spot. Critical thinking, push back, give me the details, tell me what you are really trying to do.
The programmer that rolls over and just answers the question - without enough information to actually answer the question - should send the interviewer running away. But that is apparently what a lot of interviewers are looking for.
I've been known to have three to four very simple interview questions for "Oracle people". They are designed to test the simple to the sublime. They are:
I have a table:
create table t ( ....., month number, ..... );
Month is always a number between 1 and 12.
I ask three questions about this table:
Recently, I was working on a packaged application purchased from a third-party vendor. It is one of those platform agnostic systems that started life on Microsoft SQL Server, and has been ported to Oracle. I spend a lot of my time working with PeopleSoft, so I had a certain sense of déjà vu. However, this application uses referential integrity.
The application was upgraded, and simultaneously Oracle was upgraded to 10g and then exhibited TM contention. It had probably been suffering from TM contention while running on Oracle 9i, but we hadn't realised because Oracle9i only reports 'enqueue'.
From 10g, there are no less that 208 different enqueue wait events, that show the type of lock that the process is waiting for, and sometimes additional information. In my case it was event 175. Events can be listed from v$event_name.
I wrapped up a hectic three days at Collaborate this year. As if to echo the sentiments on the economy in general, and Oracle database technology related in particular, the attendance was way down this year. The vast expanse of Orange County Convention Center didn't make it easy either; it made it appear even smaller! Well, it was Orlando; the weather and traffic cooperated and I'm pretty sure some attendees picked up a few well deserved resting points either alone or with visiting family.
I presented three sessions:
(1) RAC Performance Tuning
(2) Real World Best Practices for DBAs (with Webcast)
(3) All About Deadlocks
I also participated in the RAC Experts' Panel as a Panelist.
As always, I used to opportunity to meet old friends and acquintances. Collaborate is all about knowledge sharing; I didn't lose when it came to getting some myself. I attended some highly useful sessions:
(1) Database Capacity Planning by Ashish Rege
(2) Partitioning for DW by Vincent
(3) Hints on Hints by Jonathan Lewis
(4) 11g Performance Tuning by Rich Niemic
(5) HA Directions from Oracle by Ashish Ray
(6) Storage Performance Diagnosis by Gaja
(7) Two sessions - on Database Replay and Breaking Oracle by Jeremiah Wilton
and some more. It has been a worthy conference.
Lately I’ve been playing with Enterprise Manager Grid Control 10.2.0.4 on OEL 4.4 (I’ll upgrade this to 10.2.0.5 soon) and I’ve had a couple of product presentation and demo focusing on the Database Enterprise Management, well among all the packs under this Grid Control “Area” the hottest are the Configuration Management and Data Masking.
For the DBAs who want to have a refreser on SCN (system change number), this article article is very nice and explained clearly written by Sandeep Makol. It started on where you ‘ll find info for SCN (controlfile and datafile headers) then goes to the backup and recovery scenarios where knowledge of this “magic number” is very useful.
Below are some useful scripts (with sample output) as well
I’m definitely the type of person that gets excited by new opportunities and always loves a new challenge. Without challenge, I get bored quickly and boredom makes me a little crazy.
So, this new opportunity came along a little while ago and I thought it sounded just perfect for me. Many of you that know me will recall that I’ve had trouble finding the right company that fits with all aspects of my personality, goals, and philosophy which has led me to “try” a few of them in the past several years. I don’t regret the choices I’ve made and I’ve learned an awful lot from each of my employers. Most importantly, I’ve created new relationships at each of my past companies that I still maintain today.