In a recent OTN thread I've been reminded of two facts about Dynamic Sampling that I already knew but had forgotten in the meantime:
1. The table level dynamic sampling hint uses a different number of blocks for sampling than the session / cursor level dynamic sampling. So even if for both for example level 5 gets used the number of sampled blocks will be different for most of the 10 levels available (obviously level 0 and 10 are exceptions)
2. The Dynamic Sampling code uses a different approach for partitioned objects if it is faced with the situation that there are more partitions than blocks to sample according to the level (and type table/cursor/session) of Dynamic Sampling
Note that all this here applies to the case where no statistics have been gathered for the table - I don't cover the case when Dynamic Sampling gets used on top of existing statistics.
So this will be my Oracle related Christmas present for you: A prototype implementation that extends the DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR output making it hopefully more meaningful and easier to interpret. It is a simple standalone SQL*Plus script with the main functionality performed by a single SQL query. I've demoed this also during my recent "optimizer hacking sessions".
DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR together with the Rowsource Statistics feature (enabled via SQL_TRACE, GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS hint, STATISTICS_LEVEL set to ALL or controlled via the corresponding hidden parameters "_rowsource_execution_statistics" and "_rowsource_statistics_sampfreq") allows since Oracle 10g a sophisticated analysis of the work performed by a single SQL statement.
If you consider the usage of Table Functions then you should be aware of some limitations to the optimizer calculations, in particular when considering a join between a Table Function and other row sources.
As outlined in one of my previous posts you can and should help the optimizer to arrive at a reasonable cardinality estimate when dealing with table functions, however doing so doesn't provide all necessary inputs to the join cardinality calculation that are useful and available from the statistics when dealing with regular tables.
Therefore even when following the recommended practice regarding the cardinality estimates it is possible to end up with some inaccuracies. This post will explain why.
Join Cardinality Basics
Waits for ‘DFS lock handle’ can cause massive performance issues in a busy RAC cluster. In this blog entry, we will explore the DFS lock handle wait event, and understand how to troubleshoot the root cause of these waits. I am also going to use locks and resources interchangeably in this blog, but internally, they are two different types of structures.
A little background
DFS (stands for Distributed File System) is an ancient name, associated with cluster file system operations, in a Lock manager supplied by vendors in Oracle Parallel Server Environment (prior name for RAC). But, this wait event has morphed and is now associated with waits irrelevant to database files also. Hence, it is imperative to understand the underlying details to debug the ‘DFS lock handle’ waits.
How does it work?
This is just a short note about one of the potential side-effects of the new Auto Degree Of Parallelism (DOP) feature introduced in 11.2.
If you happen to have Parallel DML enabled in your session along with Auto DOP (and here I refer to the PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY = AUTO setting, not LIMITED) then it might take you by surprise that INSERT statements that are neither decorated with a parallel hint nor use any parallel enabled objects can be turned into direct-path inserts.
I mentioned the day before Open World I put a Virtual RAC on Oracle Linux 6.1 article live. Although the procedure was complete, some of the screen shots were from an old article as I didn’t have time to redo them before my flight. I’ve just run through the procedure again and taken new screen shots. As a result, I’ve allowed the article to display on the front page of the website, which is why you will see it listed as a new article there.
This kinda rounds out the whole Oracle on 6.1 stuff as there has been a single instance installation guide out for ages and more recently the Cloud Control installation, which references it.
Remember, it’s still not certified yet, but it’s coming.
I will be talking about “Administering Parallel Execution in RAC” with demos on Sunday morning 9AM-10AM (session id 28060). This is part of IOUG RAC SIG presentation series. You would enjoy the content and demos I have prepared.
I know, it is too early, but hoping to see you there!
BTW, if you have attended my RAC Advanced Troubleshooting class series, please don’t hesitate to introduce yourself when we meet.
Session ID: 28060
Session Title: IOUG: Administering Parallel Execution in Oracle RAC
Venue / Room: Moscone West- 2005
Date and Time: 10/2/11, 9:00 – 10:00
Update: I just completed this session in IOUG. Thank you for coming, if you were in the room.
You can download the pdf file from
PX execution in RAC
Preface (with apologies to Kevin Closson)
This blog post is too long
In the previous part of this series I've already demonstrated that the logical I/O optimization of the Table Prefetching feature depends on the order of the row sources - and 11g takes this approach a big step further.
It is very interesting that 11g does not require any particular feature like Table Prefetching or Nested Loop Join Batching (another new feature introduced in 11g) to take advantage of the Logical I/O optimization - it seems to be available even with the most basic form of a Nested Loop join.
I've already outlined in one of my previous posts that getting a reasonable cardinality estimate for multi-column joins can be tricky, in particular when dealing with correlated column values in the join columns.
Since Oracle 10g several "Multi-Column Join Cardinality" sanity checks have been introduced that prevent a multi-column join from producing too low join cardinalities - this is controlled via the "_optimizer_join_sel_sanity_check" internal parameter that defaults to true from 10g on.
This is just a short heads-up note regarding a bug that obviously has been introduced with 18.104.22.168: If you happen to have a public synonym for a table that is called differently than the original object then dynamic sampling will not work in 22.214.171.124.
The reason is that the generated query used for the dynamic sampling does not resolve the synonym name properly - it resolves the object owner but uses the synonym name instead of the actual table name. The same issue happens by the way when using a private synonym, however the query is then still valid and works even when using the synonym name.
The bug can only be reproduced in 126.96.36.199, in all previous versions including 188.8.131.52 the synonym resolution seems to work as expected for the dynamic sampling query, so it seems to be a problem introduced in that patch set.