12c Release 2

Little things worth knowing: redo transport in Data Guard 12.2 part 2

In the first part of this article I looked at a number of views and some netstat output to show how redo is transported from the primary database to its standby systems. The long story short is that TT02 (“async ORL multi”) was found sending redo to CDB3 asynchronously whilest NSS2 (“sync”) transferred redo to the synchronised target – CDB2. Unlike v$dataguard_process wanted me to believe, it really wasn’t LGWR sending redo over the network.

In this little article I would like to show you how the standby databases CDB2 and CDB3 receive redo and how you can map this back to the primary database, closing the loop.

Little things worth knowing: redo transport in Data Guard 12.2 part 1

I have researched Data Guard redo transport quite a bit, but so far haven’t really blogged about some of the details that I have worked out. This is what I am trying to do in this post.

In order to have a somewhat meaningful setup, I created a Data Guard configuration with 1 primary and 2 standby databases. They all reside on my lab (virtual) machines:

Truncated CTAS statements seem to be no longer shortened

Many bloggers have already discussed that Oracle can truncate the text of a “create table as select” statement to 20 characters depending on your version and patch level. This can be a problem in case a CTAS statement is a resource hog, yet you don’t see the SQL text that is needed for troubleshooting. A quick search on My Oracle Support reveals this can happen on 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1 and 12.1.0.2 systems unless patched of course. This has been bugging me for quite some time now, and merits a blog post.

Reproducing the offending behaviour

Oracle has provided a number of patches over time to fix this undesirable short-cutting of the SQL text. I wanted to reproduce the issue on 12.1 to demonstrate the effect. To my shame I have to admit that since 12.2 has come out I have somewhat neglected my 12.1 lab system. It was quite a bit out of date, which was useful for this blog post as it will turn out.

Changes to the Oracle preinstall RPMs in OL 7.3 and OL 7.4

For quite some time now Oracle has documented the use of the so-called preinstall RPMs to prepare Oracle Linux for the installation of the Oracle database software. I think that’s a great idea if the settings applied by the RPM fit your environment. If I find the time, I’ll write a blog post about what it does specifically in a little while. It definitely fits my lab environment, and I regularly kickstart my OL 7 VMs specifying the preinstall RPM in the %packages section.

When upgrading the current base image from Oracle Linux 7.2 to Oracle 7.4/Oracle 12.2 I noticed a few changes to the preinstall RPMs.

12.2 New Feature: the FLEX ASM disk group part 5

Some time ago I had a very interesting twitter conversation after publishing the first part of this series. The question was whether using ASM templates, which admittedly exist since Oracle 10.1, didn’t provide similar functionality as Flex Disk Groups. In other words, wouldn’t using ASM templates allow you to have high redundancy files on normal redundancy disk groups anyway?

This question has been answered by Alex Fatkulin in a blog post some time ago. In this post I would like to replay his test with my 12.2 setup. Initially I had hoped to compare the approach using ASM templates with the Flex ASM Disk Group but the post has become too long again … The actual comparison will be done with the next instalment of the series.

12.2 New Feature: the FLEX ASM disk group part 4

Flex Disk Group Properties

In the previous 3 parts I shared my investigation into ASM Flex Disk Groups, Quota Groups, File Groups, and how Quota Groups actually enforce space limits. What I haven’t discussed yet was changing properties of a File Group and the effects thereof. Properties I have in mind are related to the protection level, as discussed in the official documentation-Automatic Storage Management Administrator’s Guide, Administering Oracle ASM Disk Groups. There are of course other properties as well (and you’ll find a link to all of the modifiable properties later in this post), but they are out of scope for this investigation.

12.2 New Feature: the FLEX ASM disk group part 3

In the previous 2 parts of this mini series I introduced the Flex ASM disk group and two related concepts, the Quota Group and File Group. In what should have become the final part (but isn’t) I am interested in checking whether quotas are enforced.

(Un)fortunately I have uncovered a few more things that are worth investigating and blogging about, which is why a) this isn’t the last post and b) it got a bit shorter than the previous two. Had I combined part 3 and 4 it would have been too long for sure … BTW, you can navigate all posts using the links at the very bottom of the page.

Are quotas enforced?

The purpose of the Quota Group is … to enforce quotas on a disk group, much like on a file system. This is quite interesting, because you now have a hard limit to which databases can grow within a disk group even for non-CDBs.

12.2 New Feature: the FLEX ASM disk group part 2

In the first part of this series I explained the basics and some potential motivation behind the use of ASM Flex disk groups. In this part I would like to complete the description of new concepts.

New Concepts related to FLEX ASM Disk Groups

With the Flex disk group mounted, the next steps are to create a few new entities. First, I want to create a Quota Group. The Quota Group – as the name implies – will enforce quotas for entities residing within it. It is optional to add one yourself, Oracle creates a default Quota Group for you that does not enforce storage limits. As you will see later, the default Quota Group will be assigned to all new databases in the Flex ASM disk group.

12.2 New Feature: the FLEX ASM disk group part 1

I knew about the 12.2 FLEX ASM disk group type from other presenters but until now – when researching the feature for the upcoming DOAG HA Day – I haven’t been able to appreciate how cool this is. And I really think it is pretty cool and worth sharing! There is a lot to be said about the feature and these tests, which is why I am splitting it into multiple parts.

Please be aware that this post is about my lab experiments, I have no production experience with FLEX ASM disk groups. As with all new features it might take a while to mature, so test, test, test…

Taming XML data in the v$cell% family of Exadata views

While researching Exadata 12.2 features that have been introduced with Oracle 12.2.1.1.0 I ran into an old problem of mine, querying the v$cell% views that are new with Exadata 12.1.1.1.0 and Oracle RDBSM 12c Release 1 in a meaningful way. In case you haven’t seen them yet, these views expose cell metrics and other information in the database without having to actually connect to the cells and execute cellcli commands. They are very useful, and form the basis of the latter part of the Exadata AWR reports.

On our 12.2 Exadata system (using cellos 12.2.1.1.0 and RDBMS 12.2.0.1.0) the following views are exposed to the curious researcher: