It's probably not that well known that Oracle can actually rollback / re-start the execution of a DML statement should the cursor become invalidated. By rollback / re-start I mean that Oracle actually performs a statement level rollback (so any modification already performed by that statement until that point gets rolled back), performs another optimization phase of the statement on re-start (due to the invalidation) and begins the execution of the statement from scratch.
There’s been a lot of work in the area of profiling. One of the things I have recently fallen in love with is Brendan Gregg’s flamegraphs. I work mainly on Linux, which means I use perf for generating stack traces. Luca Canali put a lot of effort in generating extended stack profiling methods, including kernel (only) stack traces and CPU state, reading the wait interface via direct SGA reading and kernel stack traces and getting userspace stack traces using libunwind and ptrace plus kernel stack and CPU state. I was inspired by the last method, but wanted more information, like process CPU state including runqueue time.
A new version 4.22 of the XPLAN_ASH utility is available for download.
This version primarily addresses an issue with 12c - if the HIST mode got used to pull ASH information from AWR in 12c it turned out that Oracle forgot to add the new "DELTA_READ_MEM_BYTES" columns to DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY - although it got officially added to V$ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY in 12c. So now I had to implement several additional if/then/else constructs to the script to handle this inconsistency. It's the first time that the HIST view doesn't seem to reflect all columns from the V$ view - very likely an oversight rather than by design I assume.
This post is about manually calling and freeing a shared latch. Credits should go to Andrey Nikolaev, who has this covered in his presentation which was presented at UKOUG Tech 15. I am very sorry to see I did miss it.
Essentially, if you follow my Oracle 12 and shared latches part 2 blogpost, which is about shared latches, I showed how to get a shared latch:
SQL> oradebug setmypid Statement processed. SQL> oradebug call ksl_get_shared_latch 0x94af8768 1 0 2303 16 Function returned 1
Which works okay, but leaves a bit of a mess when freed:
During next year’s annual OGh DBA day (the 7th of June 2016), additional presentations will…
This blog post is inspired by a question from an attendee of Sigrid Keydana's DOAG 2015 conference session called "Raising the fetchsize, good or bad? Exploring memory management in Oracle JDBC 12c". Basically it was a question about what the wait event "SQL*Net more data to client" represents and what it really measures. In general you may use the following steps, if you don't know what a particular wait event means:
This article is about the Oracle 12c in-memory option, and specifically looks at how the background worker processes do IO to populate the in-memory column store.
Hardware: Apple Macbook with VMWare Fusion 7.1.3.
Operating system: Oracle Linux 6.7, kernel: 3.8.13-118.el6uek.x86_64.
Database version: Oracle 188.8.131.52
Patch: opatch lspatches
19392604;OCW PATCH SET UPDATE : 184.108.40.206.1 (19392604)
19303936;Database Patch Set Update : 220.127.116.11.1 (19303936)
But first things first, let’s setup the in-memory option first with a test table. The first thing to consider is to create the in-memory area to store the objects. I only want a single table stored in the in-memory area, so I can very simply look at the size of object:
While preparing to teach a class this week I have had the time to look into the In Memory (cost) option a bit closer. I noticed a few interesting things along the way and would like to share one of these here.
One of the questions I was asking myself was:
“What happens if I scan segments that are within the IM area, and some are not?”
I was primarily thinking of joins in a DWH environment, but in order to keep the test case simple enough and reproducible I decided to go with a partitioned table where the current partition is assigned to the IMCS, and the rest is not. For this test I’m relying on the Swingbench SH schema. All of this runs on my laptop in a VM so I had to be selective when it comes to indexes. I also chose to NOT partition the tables at this stage, I wanted to chose my own partitioning scheme. For reference, here is the command that created the SH schema:
There are currently some limitations to when pragma UDF will speed up your calls to PL/SQL functions from SQL.
In my post introducing the new pragma UDF feature of Oracle 12c I explained how it can be used to reduce the impact of context switching when you call a PL/SQL function from SQL.
In my example I showed how running a SQL-only SELECT statement that formatted a name for display over 100,000 records took 0.03 seconds went up to 0.33 seconds when the formatting SQL was put in a user defined PL/SQL function. This impact on performance is a shame as it is so beneficial to encapsulate business logic in one single place with PL/SQL. Stating that the PL/SQL function is a user defined one with the pragma UDF option reduced the run time to 0.08 seconds – which is removing most of the context switching overhead. Check out the prior post for full details.
In my last post I demonstrated an example how to use a PL/SQL package to monitor a workload in order to identify correlated columns. Such columns are good candidates for the creation of extended statistics since the optimiser does not assume that information stored in different columns may be related. Before starting my tests I invoked DBMS_STATS.SEED_COL_USAGE, which in turn increased Oracle’s attention level trying to find correlated columns. Eventually these have been identified (as shown in the output of DBMS_STATS.REPORT_COL_USAGE) and a subsequent call to DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS caused extended statistics to be created, including histograms. This is one way you can get extended statistics automatically, but it requires you to enable monitoring of a workload by invoking a PL/SQL API.